TBTF for 1999-05-08: Netopath
Keith Dawson (dawson dot tbtf at gmail dot com)
Sat, 8 May 13:04:33 -0400
Contents
Intercepting communications worldwide
Secret group founded by the FBI pushes international data monitoring
The CALEA law
[0]
in the US, an Australian regulation requiring tapping
of telecomms, and a secret EU policy position are all traceable
directly to the efforts of a secret international group of law
enforcement officers -- called ILETS -- convened by the FBI and meeting
since 1993 to push building universal wiretap-ability into worldwide
communications. Duncan Campbell reports for the Guardian and Observer
[1] (cookies required).
The existence and operation of the ILETS group is but one subject
covered in the report "Interception Capabilities 2000," which
Campbell authored for the European Parliament's Science and Technology
Options Assessment Panel. IC2000 was approved as a working document
at the STOA meeting in Strasbourg on 1999-05-06. It is available
here
[2]. (The text downloads 332K. Turn off graphics to avoid
another 761K; the graphics add little to the article.)
Today your email, Web browsing, online chat, telex, phone calls,
cell calls, and faxes are almost certainly being swept up in one
or more national or international interception dragnets. Unless you
routinely use PGP, or communicate over a robust encrypted VPN link,
these communications can be read by unaccountable agencies in any
one of a growing number of countries.
Does this fact make you angry? Then encrypt.
[0] http://www.statewatch.org/news2.htm
[1] http://www.newsunlimited.co.uk/The_Paper/Weekly/Story/0,3605,45981,00.html
[2] http://www.iptvreports.mcmail.com/interception_capabilities_2000.htm
An advance in factoring: Shamir's TWINKLE
Opto-electronic sieving challenges 512-bit PGP keys
Adi Shamir, one of the inventors of RSA, has made a major advance in
the factoring of large numbers
[3] (free registration and cookies
required for this NY Times story). The new work describes hardware
that, if constructed, might put the routine factoring of 150-digit
numbers more easily within reach. This would mean that 512-bit RSA
keys (for example) would be vulnerable to cracking with modest
resources.
Details of Shamir's approach have been posted on the RSA Labs site
[4]. Shamir's paper is also available in PostScript (370K)
[5] or
Zip (79K)
[6] form.
Shamir proposes a fast piece of sieving hardware dubbed TWINKLE that
could be built for about $5000 in volume. He roughly specs a
photoelectric sieving device 100 to 1000 times faster than a typical PC
for this task. Such devices are not new -- D.H. Lehmer built a
mechanical-optical sieve in the 1930's. The RSA site claims that
Shamir's device would requires some sophisticated optical/electrical
engineering to implement, but that it does appear feasible.
[3] http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/05/biztech/articles/02encr.html
[4] http://www.rsa.com/rsalabs/html/twinkle_qa.html
[5] http://jya.com/twinkle.eps
[6] http://jya.com/twinkle.zip
 |
Cryptography export policy
See also TBTF for
2000-02-06,
1999-10-05,
08-30,
08-23,
08-16,
07-26,
05-22,
05-08,
04-21,
03-01,
01-26,
more...
|
Bernstein wins appeal
Court decides, 3-2, that US encryption export laws are unconstitutional when applied to source code
A three-judge panel for the US 9th Circuit of Appeals has ruled that
the source code for Daniel Bernstein's crypto program Snuffle is
speech protected under the First Amendment. The ruling affirms a
lower-court decision issued a year and a half ago
[7], before the
control of crypto exports was moved from the State Department to
Commerce. The ruling did not provide Bernstein with injunctive
relief to publish his code pending the expected appeal by the Justice
Department to the Supreme Court.
Here is the ruling itself
[8], authored by Judge Betty Fletcher;
below are some excerpts.
Cryptographers use source code to express their scientific
ideas in much the same way that mathematicians use equations
or economists use graphs
We find that the export administration regulations operate
as a prepublication licensing scheme that burdens scientific
expression, vest boundless discretion in government
officials, and lack adequate procedural safeguards.
We emphasize the narrowness of our First Amendment holding.
We do not hold that all software is expressive. Much of it
surely is not... We hold merely that because the
prepublication licensing regime challenged here applies directly to
scientific expression, vests boundless discretion in government
officials, and lacks adequate procedural safeguards,
it constitutes an impermissible prior restraint on speech.
Whether we are surveiled by our government, by criminals,
or by our neighbors, it is fair to say that never has our
ability to shield our affairs from prying eyes been at such
a low ebb. The availability and use of secure encryption may
offer an opportunity to reclaim some portion of the privacy
we have lost. Government efforts to control encryption thus
may well implicate not only the First Amendment rights of
cryptographers intent on pushing the boundaries of their
science, but also the constitutional rights of each of us as
potential recipients of encryption's bounty. Viewed from
this perspective, the government's efforts to retard
progress in cryptography may implicate the Fourth Amendment, as
well as the right to speak anonymously..., the right against
compelled speech..., and the right to informational privacy...
The government's argument suggests that even one drop of
"direct functionality" overwhelms any constitutional
protections that expression might otherwise enjoy. This cannot be
so. If it were, we would have expected the Supreme Court to
start and end its analysis of David Paul O'Brien's burning
of his draft card with an inquiry into whether he was kept
warm by the ensuing flames.
In light of the ruling some in the crypto community are calling for
the immediate posting of cryptographically sensitive materials from
US shores. Some examples are the international Cryptography Freedom
page
[9] and the original source code for Snuffle itself
[10]. But
Cindy Cohn, one of the victorious lawyers, strikes a note of caution
[11]: it would be wiser to wait 52 days before setting up a crypto
redistribution repository in the US, even from the 6-state area
under the purview of the 9th Circuit Court.
Thanks to the TBTF Irregular David Black for his usual astute reading
of legal prose.
[7] http://tbtf.com/archive/1996-12-24.html#s01
[8] http://jya.com/bernstein-9th.htm
[9] http://jya.com/crypto-free.htm
[10] http://www.shmoo.com/~pablos/Snuffle/snuffle.shar
[11] http://www.ljx.com/mailinglists/cyberia-l/20266.html
Stunning Australian censorship proposal could become law
Advice of technical experts and government panels is ignored
TBTF Irregular
[12] Eric Scheid <eric at ironclad dot net dot au>
has been feeding me material on a drastic swing in politics
being played out now in Australia. Proposed legislation would
outlaw any Net content in that country down to an "R" rating and would
compel ISPs to block all such material worldwide from Australian
viewers. The SJ Mercury News's Dan Gillmor says
[13]:
As Australia's government races headlong toward a regime of
Internet censorship, a visitor from the United States is
tempted to ridicule the notion and the politicians who are
responsible. But I find myself more saddened than smug as I
look at the proposed bill.
Here are some salient points from the proposed legislation that
sounds more suitable to a brutal dictatorship than to an
enlightened Western society, from a posting by Kimberley Heitman,
Chair of Electronic Frontier Australia:
First new feature is the licencing of ISPs, and compulsory
trade unionism ... Daily penalties of $27,500 should be
enough to bring small ISPs into line, if the threat of being
shut down by the Federal Court doesn't.
Second, the ABA will... tell ISPs what hardware and software
to use. Oh, and from now on ISPs work weekends, as takedown
orders issued by email or fax will have to be complied-with
within 24 hours. Same penalties natch -- $27,500 daily for
merely allowing "adult themes" material.
Third, people can complain about ISPs as well as sites, for
permitting access to "adult themes" material anywhere in the
world... Is there any doubt that proxy filters are to be
compulsory?
Fourth, less censorious State and Territory laws are
overridden, and no-one under 18 is allowed to own an account.
Free speech is dead coast to coast...
And finally, everything archiveable is covered, not just web
sites. As technology improves, the industry and the public
will pay for smaller and smaller sieves down to the RAM
caches, IRC, and newsgroups.
There's no pretence in this Bill that self-regulation means
anything other than outsourcing censorship.
This extremely disturbing story is still developing; you can
follow the news on the Link mailing list
[14] (search for Alston,
Harradine, censorship). Here are some links to resources provided by
Eric Scheid.
- The government proposals
[15]
- EFA's response
[16]
- A large law firm's take on the proposed legislation
[17]
- Senator Alston's latest media release
[18]
- Links to discussion and analysis of the bill
[19]
[12] http://tbtf.com/the-irregulars.html
[13] http://www.mercurycenter.com/svtech/columns/gillmor/docs/dg050499.htm
[14] http://www.anu.edu.au/mail-archives/link/
[15] http://www.dcita.gov.au/nsapi-text/?MIval=dca_dispdoc&pathid=3648
[16] http://www.efa.org.au/Publish/PR990319.html
[17] http://www.gtlaw.com.au/pubs/newdarkage.html
[18] http://www.dcita.gov.au/nsapi-text/?MIval=dca_dispdoc&pathid=3756
[19] http://www.efa.org.au/Campaigns/99.html
Talk of US-mandated disabled access to Web pages is premature
Freedom Forum story is much reported and overblown
A little-noted law passed last year requires the Web sites of
government agencies, and of anyone who supplies Web deliverables to
the government, to meet criteria for accessibility for people with
disabilities. Adam Clayton Powell III has touched off a broad
debate with a story
[20] that projects dire consequences from this
simple and sensible law. The accessibility provision is contained
in Section 508
[21] of the Workforce Investment Act, passed last
year by Congress. While the law is mandatory only for government
sites and for contractors that provide Web content to the
government, Powell quotes some members of the committee responsible for
writing the rules as they speculate on the (to them presumably
desirable) possibility that all US-based Web sites may some day
come under the force of such rules. In a Ziff Davis interview
[22],
Jenifer Simpson, a member of the rules committee, justified such
unprecedented government intervention in a publishing medium this
way:
The Internet is subject to market forces, but it didn't start
through market forces, it was started by the federal government.
She was certainly speaking out of school. The Supreme Court has
ruled, in striking down parts of the Communications Decency Act,
that the Internet is a medium deserving of the strongest First
Amendment protections.
A poster to the fight-censorship mailing list summarized thus the
universal government tendency to give us a fat 3-ring binder when
what we need is a paragraph:
Given the reasonably sane goal of assuring that all taxpaying
citizens, regardless of their physical condition, have access to
what they've paid for, one might (if one were not a government
employee) expect something like:
"All data posted to the web by the government shall include
'alt' tags in any graphics. The government shall design web
pages to conform with the capabilities of leading tools for
the handicapped, save where such conformance defeats the
purpose of the site."
Of course, that's not what we got.
Thanks to the TBTF Irregulars, in particular Jamie McCarthy and
David Black, for perspective and editorial balance on this story.
McCarthy has written an analysis
[23] concluding that the Freedom
Forum story is irresponsible journalism and calling for a
retraction. Powell is sticking by his viewpoint.
[20] http://www.freedomforum.org/technology/1999/4/30handicapaccess.asp
[21] http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/508/508law.html
[22] http://www.msnbc.com/news/260652.asp
[23] http://truman.fac.org/forum/messagedetail.asp?msgID=16678
Electronic ink debuts
Siliconia: the e-Coast
Portsmouth, NH is the latest soon-to-be-hot tech area
Portsmouth, New Hampshire is the latest region to hold a naming
contest and launch a branding program to boost its recognition as a
technology center. The resulting Siliconium
[28] is e-Coast,
designating the 18-mile NH seacoast and adjacent areas of Massachusetts
and Maine. It's too bad the Boston Globe headline writer chose to
title its story
[29] "Silicon Seacoast." Anchoring Portsmouth's
vibrant and growing high-tech scene is venture-backed Bow Street
Software, with killer office space on the Piscataqua River where the
famous tugboats tie up
[30]. Unfortunately I can't tell you what Bow
Street does: their Web site
[31] is too high-tech for my
Communicator 4.51 browser. It presents a black-on-black window with a few
rollovers; the link to a text-only version leads back to the same
inaccessible site.
Thanks to Aaron Smith <a dot smith at rscs dot net> of the Greater
Portsmouth Chamber of Commerce for word on the e-Coast.
Note added 1999-05-11:
Kevin D. Clark <kclark at cabletron dot com> sent word of this
TechWeb story
about Bow Street Software.
[28] http://tbtf.com/siliconia.html
[29] http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/125/business/Silicon_seacoast%2b.shtml
[30] http://www.tugboatalley.com/index1.htm
[31] http://bowstreet.com/
Snailmail for the Internet age
Bridging email to a more venerable medium
A new company
[32] formed by an Irish e-commerce expert promises to
turn Net surfers into letter writers. Letterpost is the brainchild
of Dr. Donal O'Mahony of Trinity College in Dublin. While on
sabbatical at Stanford he decided to partake of the local customs and
create his own Internet startup. Here's how it works. You buy
postage at
[32], 99 cents per letter, and type the recipient's address
and your message. The letter is printed out, put in an envelope,
and mailed from one of Letterpost.com's automated mail centers. The
first such center is operational in San Francisco; Ireland will
open in May and India in June. The company will be targeting US
immigrant groups such as Irish-Americans and first- and
second-generation Indians, helping them to keep in touch with unwired
relatives back home.
TBTF Irregular John R. LoVerso <loverso dot southborough dot ma dot us>
writes:
What's old is new again. Back in '82, the US Postal Service had
an (ummm, forgot the correct term) "electronic telegram"
service. This was when they were asking Congress to allow them to
control electronic mail delivery. Anyway, one enterprising soul
made a UUCP-to-egram gateway. You had to UUCP mail
(foo!bar!another!there) the letter in an exacting format, but it ended
up getting printed and mailed. I used it several times. Like
all things in "the good old days" of the net, it was free.
Reader Prasenjeet Dutta <pd at cse dot vec dot ac dot in> notes:
A company called Multinet Infosys
[33] has been offering a free
letterpost service in India at for quite some time now. They'll
send letters to anywhere in India for free, although they do ask
you to register.
[32]
http://www.letterpost.com/
[33]
http://www.homeindia.com/post/main.htm
Web logs
Going public with your filtered browsing
If you've missed the Web log phenomenon, allow me to introduce you.
For some years Web adepts have been posting daily commentary on and
links to sites they find compelling; the first Web log may have been
NCSA's What's New page
[34]. Suddenly Web logs are legion. Leslie
Harpold comments on the phenomenon in Smug
[35]:
I love riffing through a good log, it's kind of the
vicarious voyeuristic thrill picking through someone else's purse
or junk drawer, but I'm fairly certain there's more than
enough dull stuff on the web, so no need to add to the pile.
If Web Logs become as ubiquitous as the cargo pant, the
stylishness and cache will be wholly depleted and it will be
gone faster than the wrap sandwich.
Here are some of the Web logs I find most useful to the topics TBTF
covers:
- Rafe Colburn -- Outraged Daily Edition
[36]
- Wesley Felter -- Hack the Planet
[37]
- Raphael Carter -- Honeyguide
[38] (his
Sonnets on Science
[39]
aren't bad either)
- Jesse James Garrett -- Infosift
[40]
- Lawrence Lee -- Tomalak's Realm
[41]
Some consider TBTF's Tasty Bit of the Day feature a Web log, but
that's a stretch. The TBoDay is considerably more cooked than the
items in most Web logs; it's a first draft for a regular TBTF item.
But a growing acquaintance with Web logs has moved me to make TBTF
available in "push" form to Dave Winer's Userland
[42], a sort of toolkit for
constructing your own personal meta-log.
[34] http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/Software/Mosaic/Docs/old-whats-new/whats-new-0693.html
[35] http://www.smug.com/current/net.html
[36] http://rc3.org/
[37] http://hack-the-planet.felter.org/
[38] http://www.chaparraltree.com/honeyguide/
[39] http://www.chaparraltree.com/scison/
[40] http://www.jjg.net/infosift/
[41] http://tr.pair.com/
[42] http://my.userland.com/
The world through an eBay lens
The eBay auction site is now about the size of the 1994 Internet and
I would wager it is growing as fast. Auction is one of the killer
apps of the Net today. eBay presents us with various analogies to
the early Net: it's large, shambling, nearly unmanageable; it's
fast-moving, rough-and-tumble, and very American. For weeks now Web
watchers have been passing around eBay URLs, pointing to auctions in
progress or completed, as bellwethers of coming trends. Here are a
few.
eBayla
Canadian security enthusiast Tom Cervenka, who goes by the handle
Blue Adept, has invented a new flavor of virus: he has created an
infected eBay auction item
[43] that he calls eBayla. The exploit
works because eBay allows JavaScript in the member-authored pages
describing an item offered for sale. When an eBay member bids on
an infected item, his/her username and password are emailed to
Cervenka. EBay's response
[44] to the exploit sets a new low for
bone-headedness. Not only does eBay downplay the seriousness of
the security hole; not only do they get the technical details of
the exploit's workings wrong; but they also make vague threats in
Cervenka's direction, because he brought this vulnerability to
their attention. EBay deserves to get slapped, hard, by its
members -- nothing else will make them rethink their cluelessness.
Thanks to Michael Sanders <msanders at confusion dot net> for the
prod on this story.
[43] http://www.because-we-can.com/ebayla/default.htm
[44] http://www.news.com/News/Item/Textonly/0,25,35321,00.html
Car dealer accused of libeling a competitor
A popular feature of the eBay site allows users to rate their
encounters with other site users. This forum provides some reputation
accountability: both bidders and sellers can check out others'
experiences with eBay users and choose whether to do business with
them. eBay doesn't monitor, adjudicate, or characterize the posted
comments. Recently a vendor of automobiles, new to eBay, watched
several bidders withdraw their bids after someone posted negative
comments about the dealer
[45],
[46]. With little difficulty the
dealer traced the negative postings to employees of a rival firm
operating on eBay.
[45] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/feed/biztop925293980763.htm
[46] http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/DailyNews/ebay990408.html
Auctioning an ISP team
Sixteen system administrators, developers, and managers from a "major
ISP" tried to auction themselves off on eBay
[47]. The minimum bid was
set above $3.1M, which would give the purchaser use of the team for
one year -- and provide the team members with healthy raises. It is
unclear if anyone actually bid for this "item" on eBay, but team
members said in an interview
[48]
that several companies had
contacted them. Thanks to TBTF Irregular Eric Scheid <eric at ironclad
dot net dot au> for the tip.
[47] http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=96369441
[48] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/daily/april99/ebay30.htm
13-year-old bids $3M, thinking it's a game
13-year-old Andrew Tyler's parents were surprised when an eBay
representative contacted them and asked how Andrew intended to pay
$900,000 for a Van Gogh painting he had won at auction
[49]. The
teenager had also bid on a 1955 Ford convertible, an antique bed,
a Viking ship replica, and a Superman comic book.
[49] http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/ctf027.htm
Jargon Scout: Netopath
What to call a pathological Net abuser
Jargon Scout
[50] is an irregular TBTF feature that aims to give you
advance warning -- preferably before Wired Magazine picks it up --
of jargon that is just about ready to hatch into the Net's language.
Spam fighter JoWazzoo <jowazzoo at whiteice dot com> takes credit
for coining the term "netopath," which is applied to the most
extreme and deranged form of Net abuser. The Usenet posting in which
JoWazzoo coined the term (7952fe$ggl@chronicle.concentric.net) has
expired from the archives of both Deja News and Alta Vista, but this
immediate followup post
[51], which references and quotes it,
cements JoWazzoo's claim to the invention.
[50] http://tbtf.com/jargon-scout.html
[51] http://ww2.altavista.com/cgi-bin/news?msg@266119@news%2eadmin%2enet%2dabuse%2eemail%267952fe+ggl+chronicle+concentric+net
Notes
Some readers took exception to my use of the Jive dialect in the
previous issue's title story. Upon reflection I should have chosen
another example. Apologies and no offense intended.
Sources
TBTF home and archive at http://tbtf.com/ . To subscribe send the
the message "subscribe" to tbtf-request@tbtf.com. TBTF is Copyright
1994-1999 by Keith Dawson, <dawson dot tbtf at gmail dot com>. Commercial use pro-
hibited. For non-commercial purposes please forward, post, and link as
you see fit.
_______________________________________________
Keith Dawson dawson dot tbtf at gmail dot com
Layer of ash separates morning and evening milk.
Copyright © 1994-2023 by
Keith Dawson.
Commercial use prohibited. May be excerpted, mailed,
posted, or linked for non-commercial purposes.
Most recently updated 1999-10-05
Electronic ink debuts
-- Immedia technology promises real electronic books, someday
Siliconia: the e-Coast
-- Portsmouth, NH is the latest soon-to-be-hot tech area
![[27]](http://www.electronic-ink.com/images/jcp_1.jpg){kind=link}