The roving_reporter is Ted Byfield's forum on TBTF. Its form
is still evolving. This file, http://tbtf.com/roving_reporter/index.html,
may become a frequently-updated locus of timely observation somewhat
in the stlye of the TBTF Log.
Byfield will occasionally write longer pieces that stand on their
own. The first of these, UDRP? JDRP.,
introduces two powerful men from the law firm of JDRP whose
fingerprints are all over the development of the Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.
The current issue is here.
Wed Nov 24 23:03:04 EST 1999
there are some pretty interesting discussions afoot on the
cryptography list (and i'm sure many others) about the new
US crypto draft regulations that <cough> leaked. it *seems*
that the BXA (Bureau of Export Administration, part of the
Commerce Department) may have stumbled onto YA way to keep
crypto under control. by linking export regulations to the
type of license that governs a given piece of software, it
may be able to 'infect' derivative software. put as simply
as i can manage, if the regulations require that something
written in the US and released with source under GPL be re-
viewed for export, then any subsequent software incorporat-
ing code from that GPLed software--regardless of where the
bulk of it was written -- must be reviewed prior to export
from the US. steve bellovin called this 'viral regulation.'
it's not a very happy idea that GPL/BSD/etc licenses could
be co-opted toward this end. the tucows OpenSRS system was
faced with an analogous problem: tucows itself is accredit-
ed by ICANN, so anyone who uses their open-source software
is subject to tucows' (how do you do that possessive?) con-
tract with ICANN, including the UDRP.
the problem--well, one of many problems--with this kind of
co-optation is that it tends to generalize liability. when
some domain dispute erupts within the tucows system, who's
going to get hauled into civil court? and if there's a dis-
pute about the authorship of some open-source software the
gubmint doesn't want exported, who'll get hauled into crim-
inal court? unfortunately, the likely answer in both cases
is *everyone within reach*. it may be a quick fix for pres-
sing problems, but it seems like it'll take a serious toll
on the rule of law in the long run.
The above material is Copyright © 1999 by t. byfield.
The r_r began as a collaborative nym on the <nettime> list, where it worked well; but the
pseudonym precluded comments, and there was more to report than was
good for the list, so now it -- or a mutation of it -- has
resurfaced on TBTF. [ top
Site Copyright © 1994-2017 by
Commercial use prohibited. May be excerpted, mailed,
posted, or linked for non-commercial purposes.